Comments on: one lunch, or two? http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/ Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:58:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: Susannah http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12010 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 22:30:25 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12010 Lou Lou…No need to waste time leaving comments for me as I won’t be reading them any more – better things to do.

It is too rash too unadvised too sudden!

]]> By: Andrew http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12009 Wed, 30 Aug 2006 19:19:59 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12009 Lou Lou – no need to waste time leaving comments for me as I won’t be reading them anymore – better things to do.

Parting is such sweet sorrow.

]]> By: Parkin Pig http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12008 Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:26:01 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12008 Tut, tut, I’ve spotted one of those rare spelling errors. Para 3, line 4, that should read “unperturbed”. Presumably a proof reader will correct this kind of mistake in the book.

]]> By: Welsh Cake http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12007 Mon, 28 Aug 2006 08:07:18 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12007 James H. You’re wrong,I’ve made enquiries – actually its a hearse. Eew!

]]> By: L http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12006 Mon, 28 Aug 2006 07:39:27 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12006 No hectoring tone intended, as a language teacher I’ll recommend the site to my students for the English content as it’s extremely well written but no need to waste time leaving comments for me as I won’t be reading them anymore – better things to do. Good luck, hope you find a new job soon – Paris is certainly the place to be, it’s full of opportunities.

Lou lou

]]> By: tony http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12005 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 22:37:17 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12005 re 62:

Or even the hairy eye of the beholder!

]]> By: Andrew http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12004 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 21:33:05 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12004 I find Babel Fish quite useful at turning froggy into English. It makes of Kleiner’s(61) comments -
“Although Louise Ralston is right at the legal level, it seems to to me that in the sight of your friendship with Mimi, it would have been unforgivable of your share to have censured its comment. It should be also said that the remarks of Mimi are less wounding, since made in a general way and with humour, that those of Louise towards J (45)”
Hmm…I think I get it.

It’s even more fun to translate a complex English passage into French and then back again. Keeps me amused for hours.

“Judy likes it in the ears.”

I like the way James(54) moves the plot on, and up, to ‘aural’ sex…

]]> By: 4 roses http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12003 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:07:41 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12003 we still don’t know by the way if judy loves it up the ****. So PLEASE stop turning around it and give us the answer. There are others matters.
(excusez mon anglais approximatif)

]]> By: j http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12002 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:36:06 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12002 Vielen Dank, petit lache.

]]> By: Cedric http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12001 Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:39:25 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/archives/2006/08/24/one-lunch-or-two/#comment-12001 For Gods sake Kleiner, can’t you speak English? I can’t understand a word your saying.

]]>