Comments on: remembrance of things past http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/ Mon, 10 Oct 2011 07:58:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: David Weman http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7302 Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:21:29 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7302 Psst.

]]> By: Doutriaux http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7301 Mon, 13 Feb 2006 18:30:07 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7301 Bonjour, je suis journaliste au Parisien et j’essaie de vous joindre désespérement pour que vous me parliez de votre site dans le cadre d’un article sur les blogs réalisés par des étrangers vivant à Paris.
Pourriez-vous me rappeler au plus vite au 0140104863 ?
Merci !
cordialement
Géraldine Doutriaux

]]> By: Ludovic Windsor http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7300 Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:26:51 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7300 Absolutely a great blog, keep going.

And thanks for the anti-valentine link, I’ved posted on this one:

http://richmondtransits.blogspot.com/2006/02/anti-valentine.html
http://richmondtransits.blogspot.com/2006/02/anti-valentine.html

]]> By: varske http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7299 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:19:04 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7299 I think Buzzgirl had it right, it’s just no accurate sense of time. Also it’s fun at that age saying things just to see what happens. Where did the rule that what you say has to be true come from?

]]> By: nardac http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7298 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:37:32 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7298 imperative and past tense. now you are truly screwed.

]]> By: Jonathan Sawyer http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7297 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:39:26 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7297 Regarding your child’s lying she is quite obviously a budding politician to tell lies on such a scale, encourage her behaviour as much as you can or smother her, depending on whether you care for politicians or not.

]]> By: sean http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7296 Sat, 11 Feb 2006 02:19:00 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7296 Bless! What a beautiful post.

]]> By: Z http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7295 Fri, 10 Feb 2006 11:01:35 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7295 If Tadpole won’t eat pasta/wear that etc. because she says she did that ‘yesterday’, at least you can turn that to your advantage by refusing her chocolate – “but you won’t want that; you told me, you had it yesterday”. It won’t convince her but it might take her a while to think of a good counter-argument.

]]> By: Maxi http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7294 Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:52:42 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7294 Yeah i really envy Tadpoles perfect tense formations…I regularly fail to get it right in both French and English…
Its surprised me aswell how quickly shes managed to figure out that to mummy she speaks English, but to the French she speaks French…she sounds incredibly bright. Its surprising how she knows which words belong to which language, too. Different sounds…but someone so tiny picking up on its amazing:)

]]> By: buzzgirl http://petiteanglaise.com/2006/02/09/remembrance-of-things-past/#comment-7293 Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:05:47 +0000 http://www.petiteanglaise.com/?p=389#comment-7293 I also don’t think she’s doing it *all* on purpose. At her age, she has no real sense of time, so “yesterday” may just mean “in the past” to her. Now about that chocolate…:)

]]>